A forum to discuss HaT products, ETS, uniformology, modeling, painting, and other essentials associated with HaT products.
While the figures look fantastic, do you think you may have missed the boat with the WWI cavalry now that a competitor has put out a fairly extensive range of WWI German and Russian cavalry? The average WWI wargamer probably doesn't require masses of cavalry.
I don't say this to be negative at all; rather thinking about the profitability/economics for HaT.
Surely the gap to exploit (please excuse the pun) is early war French cavalry or Austrian cavalry.....which no one has done.
Very excited about the other prospects....particularly the Sassanids and Early WWII Brits.
First, the competitor cavalry is aesthetically diferent, with different body proportion.
Second, it is difficult to find.
Third, there is no Cossack Cavalry.
They rival Airfix in useful poses and uniforms. I hope they make the cut.
Napoleonic Austrian infantry.
I'm an Ancients gamer. The Sassanid Persian Cataphracts and Elephants would be a natural first choice for me.
Please, less lances to ww1 cavalry. More heavy weapons to ww2 british and US
Agree with Vadim on WW1 cavalry lances - many (if not all?) armies only issued lances to half the men in a cavalry unit, to equip the front rank in a charge, but as the war went on they became increasingly irrelevant. Therefore would be great to have more optional arms holding swords and carbines.
Thanks for asking.
It would be nice to see existing ranges completed first i.e. The Sassanids, Austrians for 7YW and WW1 cavalries before embarking on newer lines like ACW or WW2 GI's
No Napoleonic figures so not much interest for me, but did vote sys.